Make a Fixed Time for Study

עשה תורתך קבע – אמור מעט ועשה הרבה

Marry that Maid

Posted by rabbiart on June 3, 2008

A study of the traditional 613 mitzvot (commandments/obligations) according to their order of appearance in the Torah.

Here is a mitzvah that we cannot observe in our time. It applies only when the jubilee year is in effect, but more importantly, we no longer have servitude as described in the Torah and interpreted in the Talmud.  Since we no longer sell ourselves – or others – into servitude to pay off debts, it seems that we can neither keep nor violate this particular mitzvah.

The Mitzvah is based on Shemot 21:8-11, which describe the treatment of maidservants, including minors. In general, they are either married to the “purchaser” or his son, or else they go free by redemption of the original debt. They are also freed if the husband fails to meet the obligations described in verse eleven.  Sefer HaHinuch, writing in a time when these laws could not be observed, gives a wonderful drosh on the meaning of this mitzvah.  Commenting on verse eleven which refers to the three marital obligations, he says the obligations must be met out of the husband’s free will; he is not to be coerced. “Nevertheless, if he did so, he has fulfilled a mitzvah and acted worthily; blessing shall come upon him; and good and worthy sons are due to issue from their marriage.”

What are we to do with this mitzvah?

Since we cannot act on the pshat meaning of this mitzvah, is there some new interpretation we could make that would bring it to life?

What underlies  this mitzvah is debt and the inability to pay it off.  So the girl’s father sells her into servitude to fulfill his debt.  The Talmudic interprets the purchase to indicate marital intent as well.  Surprisingly, marital intent creates obligations for the master! If there is any mis- or mal- treatment, the maidservant goes free.  This may, depending on circumstances, cancel a significant portion of the debt, leaving the master with neither full repayment nor maidservant. (The servant earned a wage sufficient to save toward paying off the debt.)

Could the design of this mitzvah be applied to debt payment in our time? Suppose issuing a mortgage created obligations for the lender similar to the master’s obligations toward the maidservant.  And that mis- behavior by the lender could result in the loan being cancelled, with the home owner “going free”, i.e. keeping the house.

That would certainly be a different kind of world.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: